Designing for injection stretch blow molding (ISBM) presents several challenges due to the complexity of the process.
First, designers must account for material distribution and wall thickness. During molding, the plastic is injected into a preform, then stretched and blown into the final shape, requiring precise control over how material flows to avoid weak points or inconsistencies. Second, part geometry can be tricky—sharp corners or intricate features are difficult to achieve without compromising structural integrity. The preform design is particularly important, as it dictates how the material will behave during stretching and blowing, influencing the final part's strength and appearance. Temperature control is another challenge. The plastic must be at the right viscosity for optimal stretch and blow. Too hot, and the material may sag; too cool, and it won’t stretch enough. Finally, mold design and cooling systems must be optimized to ensure uniform thickness and minimize defects. Variations in cooling rates can lead to warping or uneven wall thickness, affecting both functionality and aesthetics.
In summary, ISBM requires precise control over material flow, temperature, and part geometry to create strong, consistent, and aesthetically pleasing products.
To address the challenges of injection stretch blow molding (ISBM), engineers implement several key design solutions. First, they optimize preform design, focusing on uniform wall thickness to ensure even material distribution during the blow molding process. This often involves using advanced simulation tools to predict how material will flow and stretch. For geometry challenges, designers incorporate gradual radii and rounded corners to reduce stress concentrations and improve the moldability of the part. In more complex designs, they may use multiple-stage molds or advanced tooling to achieve intricate features without sacrificing strength. To control temperature, engineers carefully manage the preform's cooling rate. Preform temperature must be consistent across the part for uniform stretching. This is often achieved through precise heating systems and advanced mold cooling channels to prevent warping and ensure consistent wall thickness. Material selection also plays a crucial role; using resins with the right balance of flow and strength properties helps to achieve optimal results. In some cases, the addition of additives can enhance stretchability and reduce defects. Finally, mold design is critical. Multi-cavity molds with precise control over cooling and air pressure ensure high-quality, consistent parts, while automation is often employed to streamline production and reduce cycle times.
ANSYS Fluent Polyflow is a powerful simulation tool used to address the engineering challenges in injection stretch blow molding (ISBM). It enables engineers to model the complex fluid dynamics of polymer flow during the injection, stretching, and blowing phases, providing insights into material behavior and part performance. Polyflow simulates the injection process, predicting the material distribution within the preform, helping to identify areas of uneven thickness or stress concentrations that could lead to defects like warping or weakness. For the stretching and blowing phases, Polyflow simulates how the preform material deforms under mechanical stretching and pressure during blowing, allowing engineers to optimize preform geometry and mold design. This helps ensure uniform wall thickness and structural integrity in the final product. Polyflow also facilitates temperature and cooling simulations, ensuring the preform is heated to the optimal viscosity for blowing. By simulating thermal gradients, engineers can adjust cooling rates and mold design to prevent issues like warping or inconsistent thickness.
Setting up Injection Stretch Blow Molding with Ansys Fluent-Polyflow in this discussion involves several steps. These steps include thought map, product map, and Polyflow case setup.
Thought Map: A thought map of the blow molding characteristics is generated to organize and represent ideas, concepts, or information in a structured way. The thought map below shows the objective of the simulation study and questions asked to address the objective. Each question is followed by a theory, action, and prediction to address each question. Results would also be added to the bottom of each branch as they are generated.
Product Map: A product map of the blow molding preform, mold, and rod is generated to list and categorize product features. A product map indicates factors that correspond to theories/actions in the thought map.
Polyflow Simulation: Polyflow models are generated per the studies produced by the thought map. In this case a fractional factorial DOE is employed which results in unique Polyflow treatments. The images below show the sequence of steps for populating inputs for a Polyflow model.
The motion of the rod and the inflation pressure are both defined using expressions.
The simulation calculations are executed to generate the results, focusing on thickness and overlap. Treatments data are analyzed to answer the theory questions and confirm or contradict predictions.
Graphical Analysis: The charts below display the results for the treatments. The charts indicate that the input factor have small impact on the output metrics. The fluid density and the stretch speed have more influence on the minimum thickness than the viscosity and pressure. The density has less impact on maximum area stretch in comparison to the other three factors. The inflation pressure has slightly more impact than the other three factors.
Increasing the fluid density tends to increase the minimum thickness and to increase the area of self contact. Increasing the viscosity tends to decrease the maximum area stretch and the area of self contact. Increasing the stretch speed tends to increase the minimum thickness, increase the maximum area stretch, and decrease the area of self contact. Increasing the inflation pressure tends. to increase the maximum area stretch and increase the area of self contact.
The contour plots below show the small variation in area stretch among the eight treatments.
The animation below shows the process of rod motion as well as the inflation.
Setup Details: The following video steps through highlights of the setup.
ANSYS offers advanced capabilities for simulating Injection Stretch Blow Molding which offer numerous benefits, including enhanced design optimization, improved reliability, and cost savings. By accurately predicting blow molding performance, manufacturers can design products that meet specific requirements more efficiently.
Ultimately, ANSYS Fluent Polyflow provides a comprehensive, virtual environment to fine-tune material behavior, mold design, and process parameters, leading to more efficient production, reduced trial-and-error, and improved part quality in ISBM processes.
Ansys Fluent-Polyflow enables the evaluation of multiple design/input factors such as density, viscosity, stretch speed, and inflation pressure. A manufacturing engineer can evaluate multiple design options to understand the molding behavior. Beyond Polyflow, ANSYS provides tools such as LS-Dyna, DesignXplorer, OptiSLang, and Mechanical for further design parametrization and evaluation.
Ozen Engineering Inc. leverages its extensive consulting expertise in CFD, FEA, optics, photonics, and electromagnetic simulations to achieve exceptional results across various engineering projects, addressing complex challenges like Injection Stretch Blow Molding.
We offer support, mentoring, and consulting services to enhance the performance and reliability of your blow molding system. Trust our proven track record to accelerate projects, optimize performance, and deliver high-quality, cost-effective results for both new and existing systems. For more information, please visit https://ozeninc.com.
Suggested Blogs